Topics

Latest

AI

Amazon

Article image

Image Credits:NTSB via Getty Images

Apps

Biotech & Health

Climate

plastic covers the exterior of the fuselage plug area of Alaska Airlines Flight 1282 Boeing 737-9 MAX on January 7, 2024 in Portland, Oregon. A door-sized section near the rear of the Boeing 737-9 MAX plane blew off 10 minutes after Alaska Airlines Flight 1282 took off

Image Credits:NTSB via Getty Images

Cloud Computing

Commerce

Crypto

enterprisingness

EVs

Fintech

fund raise

Gadgets

back

Google

Government & Policy

ironware

Instagram

layoff

Media & Entertainment

Meta

Microsoft

privateness

Robotics

security measures

Social

Space

Startups

TikTok

Transportation

Venture

More from TechCrunch

Events

Startup Battlefield

StrictlyVC

Podcasts

Videos

Partner Content

TechCrunch Brand Studio

Crunchboard

Contact Us

It’s ‘not super far fetched,’ experts say, ‘because impacts are complicated’

It is not common for aeroplane to lose a door midair and yet demesne safely . That ’s what come about toAlaska Airlines 1282,which landed in Portland , Oregon . But wonders never cease .

In a viral post , X exploiter Seanathan Bates documented how he had foundan iPhone on the side of the roadthat came from an Alaska Airlines rider and had ostensibly survived the 16,000 - base drop “ perfectly intact . ”

incur an iPhone on the side of the road … Still in airplane modal value with half a battery and undefended to a luggage title for#AlaskaAirlinesASA1282 Survived a 16,000 foot drop perfectly in tactfulness !

When I call it in , Zoe at@NTSBsaid it was the SECOND speech sound to be find . No door yet 😅 pic.twitter.com / CObMikpuFd

— Seanathan Bates ( @SeanSafyre)January 7 , 2024

As Bates lateradded , there ’s some shade to how intact the twist may have been , but “ the blind did n’t have any damage . ”

Join us at TechCrunch Sessions: AI

Exhibit at TechCrunch Sessions: AI

In an email to TechCrunch , the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board confirm that it was n’t just one machine , but “ two jail cell phones likely from the trajectory ” that had been recovered and turned over to Alaska Airlines . The most spectacular point is that “ they were both functioning iPhones . ”

How is it possible that a smartphone could survive such a massive fall , when there are multitude walking around with shattered screens from much small incident ? “ Many readers oppose to Bates ’s post by quipping that their phone had unwrap after downslope of only a few foot , ” the Guardianobserved .

But while many of us are boggle , experts are n’t .

“Impacts are complicated”

One of these experts isRhett Allain , an associate professor of physics and blogger who also run a YouTube communication channel , Dot Physics . Here ’s the first half of his explanation :

It ’s potential your speech sound could weaken if you drop it from 3 foundation but not from 1,000 feet . Why ? It ’s because impacts are complicated . Suppose you cast your phone off the table and it lands on something hard . Since hard thing do n’t “ give ” during the collision , there will be a very short impingement time . A short encroachment time would require a large force to check it . It ’s this larger effect that can make the phone break .

Wait . It get even bad . Imagine you drop your phone out of your pocket and it lands on a tiny rock . Now the impact force will be magnanimous ( just like hit the story ) and the encroachment area is very small . This intend the force per unit area on impact will be high ( pressure = force / area ) . This is dissimilar from the phone landing place flat on a flat surface with a orotund impact area .

SinceiFixItis illustrious for its repair usher , CEO and self - described fixerKyle Wiensalso have it away a thing or two about broken devices . So not only was he not surprised that a pilot iPhone made it unscathed , he also screw that thiswasn’t the first time . Hence his reaction : “ I would n’t say this is super far bring ! ”

Wiens made the same decimal point as Allain on impacts . “ It looks like [ the iPhone ] landed on soil instead of concrete , which I ’m sure helped a mess . ” But both of them also pointed out another factor : terminal velocity .

Two forces, one phone

“ Theterminal velocity of an iPhoneis slower than you ’d mean . atmosphere resistance specify the maximum velocity , so it ’s not inevitably going any faster falling from 18,000 foot than 1,000 invertebrate foot , ” Wiens explained .

Allain went into a bit more detail with his physics professor chapeau on :

As a earphone falls over a greater distance , there will be two force acting on it . The gravitational force-out root for down and there is also an upwards push air travel resistance force . This tune resistance increase in magnitude as the phone move quicker through the air .   So , at some point these two forces ( gravity and air resistor ) will balance and the phone will arrest increasing in speed — thus moving at a constant speed .

TL;DR : “ Once the telephone set extend to terminal velocity , it does n’t matter how in high spirits up it fell from . ”

This look at us back to why a cover will sometimes shatter after a fall , and sometimes not . It ’s the combination of terminal velocity and the surface it put down on that determines whether or not the phone will separate down . Much more than summit . And definitely more than whether aeroplane style was on !