Topics
recent
AI
Amazon
Image Credits:Apple
Apps
Biotech & Health
Climate
Image Credits:Apple
Cloud Computing
Commerce
Crypto
enterprisingness
EVs
Fintech
Fundraising
convenience
Gaming
Government & Policy
ironware
Layoffs
Media & Entertainment
Meta
Microsoft
Privacy
Robotics
Security
Social
Space
inauguration
TikTok
Transportation
speculation
More from TechCrunch
Events
Startup Battlefield
StrictlyVC
Podcasts
video recording
Partner Content
TechCrunch Brand Studio
Crunchboard
get through Us
U.K. consumer rights group ‘ Which ? ’ is filing a sound call against Apple under competition law on behalf of some 40 million user of iCloud , its cloud storage service .
Thecollective legal proceeding lawsuit , which is seeking £ 3 billion in recompense damages ( around $ 3.8 billion at current interchange charge per unit ) , alleges that Apple has split up competition rule by giving its own swarm storage service discriminatory discussion and effectively locking hoi polloi into paying for iCloud at “ rip - off ” price .
“ Io has a monopoly and is in control of Apple ’s operating systems and it is incumbent on Apple not to employ that dominance to get ahead an unjust advantage in related to markets , like the swarm storage marketplace . But that is exactly what has happen , ” Which wrote in a press release announcing the filing of the title with the U.K. ’s Competition Appeal Tribunal ( CAT ) .
The lawsuit accuses Apple of encouraging user of its devices to sign up for iCloud for pic storage and other data repositing needs , while simultaneously make it difficult for consumer to use substitute storehouse provider — including by not allowing them to lay in or back up all of their phone ’s data with a third - company provider .
“ iOS users then have to pay for the service once photograph , note , messages and other datum go over the detached 5 GB limit , ” Which noted .
The suit also accuses Apple of surcharge U.K. consumers for iCloud subscription owe to the lack of rivalry . “ Apple raised the price of iCloud for UK consumers by between 20 % and 29 % across its store level in 2023 , ” it wrote , saying it ’s seeking damage for all affected Apple customer — and estimate that individual consumers could be owe an average of £ 70 ( around $ 90 ) , depend on how long they ’ve been paying Apple for iCloud services .
A similar suit — argue Apple unlawfully monopolized the market for cloud storage — was filed in the U.S.back in Marchand remains pending after the companyfailed to get it tossed .
Join us at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
Exhibit at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
Responding to the U.K. suit , Apple spokesman Tom Parker send a instruction in which the company wrote : “ Apple believes in providing our customers with option . Our users are not required to utilise iCloud , and many bank on a wide range of third - political party alternatives for data storage . In addition , we work hard to make data transference as easy as possible — whether its to iCloud or another service . We pass up any proposition that our iCloud practices are anticompetitive and will smartly champion against any legal call otherwise . ”
Apple claims its pricing for iCloud is standardised to that of other cloud storage supplier . Many of Apple ’s customers use alternative storage options , it also suggests , noting that intimately half its customers are not paying for iCloud+ , either because they do not need extra reposition or do n’t want to use its paid service .
U.K.-based consumers opted in
The U.K. call is being brought on an opt - out basis for U.K.-based consumers who are eligible to be included . Consumers who live outside the U.K. and think they are eligible to be included must actively opt in to join the action .
Which spokesman Tommy Handley tell apart us eligible Apple customers let in “ anyone who has ‘ obtain ’ iCloud services , include non - compensable users , over the nine - twelvemonth timeframe since the Consumer Rights Act came into force on October 1 , 2015 .
Handley also affirm that the £ 3 billion recompense physique accounts for potential opt - outs , duplicates , and mortality .
Which is a nonprofit but the judicial proceeding is being funded by Litigation Capital Management ( LCM ) , a major global litigation funder , which it says has place to seeing the action at law through to the last .
At the same time , Which is urge Apple to address the title without the penury for litigation — by offering consumer their money back and curtain raising up iOS to allow substance abuser “ a real choice ” for cloud services .
point out in a argument , Which ’s master executive director Anabel Hoult say : “ By get this claim , Which ? is showing big tummy like Apple that they can not rend off UK consumer without facing repercussions . Taking this sound action means we can help consumers to get the restitution that they are owe , deter similar conduct in the future and create a better , more competitory securities industry . ”
take over Apple does n’t search to conciliate out of homage , the next phase for the judicial proceeding will hinge on whether the CAT award license for Which to playact as a class example for consumers and allows the call to proceed on a corporate groundwork .
There has been an uptick inclass action - style challenger suits against Big Techin late years followinga waveofantitrust enforcementsonboth sides of the Atlanticthat’sstill playing outin terms offull outcomes and business concern impact .
In the U.K. , Apple has also been direct in a class - action style antimonopoly suitbrought on behalf of developers last year , in relative to App Store fee .
Also last yr , a disjoined U.K. suittargeted Apple and Amazon allege damage collusion .
This report card was updated with comment from Apple .
