Topics
late
AI
Amazon
Image Credits:Bryce Durbin/TechCrunch
Apps
Biotech & Health
mood
Image Credits:OpenAI/Microsoft
Cloud Computing
Commerce
Crypto
Enterprise
EVs
Fintech
Fundraising
Gadgets
gage
Government & Policy
Hardware
Layoffs
Media & Entertainment
Meta
Microsoft
Privacy
Robotics
certificate
Social
Space
Startups
TikTok
Transportation
speculation
More from TechCrunch
event
Startup Battlefield
StrictlyVC
Podcasts
Videos
Partner Content
TechCrunch Brand Studio
Crunchboard
meet Us
This week wasan exciting onefor the AI residential area , asApplejoined Google , OpenAI , Anthropic , Meta and others in the long - running competition to find an ikon that even remotely advise AI to users . And like everyone else , Apple has punted .
Apple Intelligenceis represented by a round shape made up of seven loops . Or is it a rope with a lopsided infinity symbolization inside ? No , that’sNew Siri , poweredbyApple Intelligence . Or is New Siri when your earpiece glows around the edges ? Yes .
The affair is , no one knows what AI looks like , or even what it is suppose to look like . It does everything but looks like nothing . Yet it want to be represent in exploiter interfaces so people get it on they ’re interacting with a machine learning example and not just plain old searching , submitting , or whatever else .
Although approaches differ to stigmatise this supposedly all - find out , all - knowing , all - doing intelligence service , they have conflate around the estimate that the avatar of AI should be non - baleful , nonfigurative , but comparatively simple and non - anthropomorphic . ( They seem to have rejectedmy suggestion that these modelling always mouth in rhyme . )
former AI icons were sometimes picayune robots , wizard chapeau or magic wands : novelties . But the implication of the first is one of inhumanity , rigidness and restriction — automaton do n’t know thing , they are n’t personal to you , they perform predefined , automated task . And wizard scepter and the like propose irrational invention , the inexplicable , the mysterious — perhaps ok for an image author or creative sounding board , but not for the kind of factual , reliable answer these company require you to believe AI provides .
collective logotype design is generally a strange concoction of hard vision , commercial-grade necessity and compromise - by - committee . And you may see these influences at study in the Son pictured here .
The strongest visual modality goes , for good or bad , to OpenAI ’s black dot . A cold , featureless hole that you confound your query into , it ’s a bit like a wishing well or Echo ’s cave .
Biggest committee energy go away , unsurprisingly , to Microsoft , whose Copilot logotype is effectively ineffable .
But detect how four of the six ( five of seven if you count Apple twice , and why should n’t we ) apply pleasant confect colouration : colors that imply nothing but are gay and approachable , leaning toward the feminine ( as such thing are considered in design language ) or even the childlike .
delicate gradients into pink , empurpled and turquoise ; pastel , not knockout colors ; four are diffused , never - ending form ; Perplexity and Google have shrewd edges , but the former intimate an sempiternal record while the latter is a well-chosen , symmetric champion with welcoming concavities . Some also renovate in exercise , create the impression of lifetime and responsivity ( and draw the eye , so you ca n’t cut it — front at you , Meta ) .
Overall , the notion signify is one of friendliness , nakedness and vague potential — as fight down to expression like , for example , expertness , efficiency , decisiveness or creative thinking .
Think I ’m overanalyzing ? How many pages do you think the design treatment documents ran for each of these logo — over or under 20 pages ? My money would be on the former . company obsess over these things . ( Yet somehowmiss a hate symboldead center , or produce aninexplicably intimate vibe . )
The point , however , is not that incorporated design teams do what they do , but that no one has managed to slay on a visual concept that unambiguously says “ AI ” to the drug user . At best these coloured shapes pass a negative construct : that this user interface isnotemail , nota lookup engine , nota note app .
electronic mail Son oftenfigure as an envelopebecause they are ( obviously ) electronic mail , both conceptually and practically . A more general “ transport ” picture for content is pointed , sometimes divided , like a paper plane , indicating a document in gesture . preferences practice a gear or twist , suggesting tinkering with an locomotive engine or car . These concepts apply across languages and ( to some extent ) generations .
Not every icon can touch so intelligibly to its corresponding part . How does one indicate “ download , ” for example , when the Holy Scripture differ between cultures ? In France , one telécharges , which makes sense but is n’t really “ download . ” Yet we have arrived at a downward - pointing pointer , sometimes touching down on a open . Load down . Same with cloud computing — we adopted the cloud despite it being , essentially , a selling full term for “ a expectant datacenter somewhere . ” But what was the alternative , a tiny datacenter button ?
AI is still new to consumers who are being asked to utilise it in blank space of “ other matter , ” a highly cosmopolitan category that purveyors of AI products are loath to define , since to do so would entail that there are some things AI can do and some it ca n’t . They are not ready to admit this : The whole fiction depends on AI being able to do anything in theory , it being but a issue of engineering and compute to achieve it .
In other word , to reword Steinbeck : Every AI considers itself as a temporarily abashed AGI . ( Or I should say , is look at by its merchandising section , sinceAI itself , as radiation diagram generator , considers nothing . )
In the meantime , these companies must still call it by a name and give it a “ face ” — though it is tell apart , and refreshing , that no one in reality chose a face . But even here they are at the whim of consumers , who ignore GPT translation numbers as an oddment , prefer to say ChatGPT ; who ca n’t make the connexion with “ Bard ” but acquiesce to the focal point - test “ Gemini ” ; who never wanted to Bing things ( and certainly not speak to the thing ) but do n’t mind having a co-pilot .
Apple , for its part , has taken the shotgun approach : You ask Siri to query Apple Intelligence ( two different Word ) , which take place within your individual Cloud Compute ( unrelated to iCloud ) , or perhaps evenforward your request to ChatGPT(no logo countenance ) , and your upright cue that an AI is take heed to what you ’re saying is … eddy colors , somewhere or everywhere on the covert .
Until AI is itself a bit well defined , we can wait icon and Son representing it to continue to be vague , unthreatening , abstract shapes . A coloured , ever - shift blob would n’t take your task , would it ?
