Topics
Latest
AI
Amazon
Image Credits:Bryce Durbin/TechCrunch
Apps
Biotech & Health
Climate
Image Credits:Bryce Durbin/TechCrunch
Cloud Computing
Commerce Department
Crypto
Enterprise
EVs
Fintech
fund raise
Gadgets
punt
Government & Policy
Hardware
Layoffs
Media & Entertainment
Meta
Microsoft
Privacy
Robotics
surety
societal
Space
startup
TikTok
Transportation
Venture
More from TechCrunch
Events
Startup Battlefield
StrictlyVC
Podcasts
Videos
Partner Content
TechCrunch Brand Studio
Crunchboard
get hold of Us
The DOJ is accusing Apple of operating like a monopoly, and the implications of the case stretch far beyond iOS and iPhones themselves
Apple ’s antimonopoly examination has reached a fever pitch . The U.S. Department of Justice herald Thursdaythat it file a case accusing the company of behave like a monopoly in locking in iPhone customer and restrict competitors make computer hardware and software . The lawsuit , which comes on the heels ofsignificant antitrust cases against Apple outside the U.S. , is a astray - ranging and complicated matter , but we ’re overlay the IN and outs of the DOJ ’s type , the diligence ’s response and all the ongoing conditional relation for companies and customer .
We ’ll be updating this page as the Apple antitrust case develop , but keep in mind that there will be little resolve in the brusque term . Experts forecast a three - to - five - year timeline for any resolution for the case .
The DOJ’s claims against Apple
If you want to dive into sound Commerce instantly , you could take the DOJ ’s case mighty here . But for the ease of us , there are five categories that the charge name as areas in which Apple actively suppress competition .
“ Super ” apps : These are applications that contain numerous functions within a single app . This should ring a bell for anyone followingElon Musk ’s “ everything app ” aspiration for go , and the DOJ take Apple is inhibit their success to increase addiction on the iPhone .
Messaging apps : The blue bubble , unripened house of cards effect is specifically name by the DOJ as a factordiscouraging iPhone users from take on a competitor twist . “ This gist is in particular muscular for sure demographics , like teenagers — where the iPhone ’s share is 85 percent , harmonize to one survey , ” the DOJ said in the case .
Cloud streaming gaming apps : The DOJ suit highlight Apple ’s allege opposition to cloud - free-base gaming , claiming its actions are to forestall consumers from flirt games “ without the motive for users to purchase hefty , expensive hardware . ”
Digital wallets : Though the 0.15 % fee Apple take for all dealings made through Apple Pay is a fraction of the fellowship ’s total revenue , the DOJ alleges that the ubiquity of Apple Pay within its mobile ecosystemmeans it has “ concluded control ” over users ’ NFC payments and that it hinders competitors .
Join us at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
Exhibit at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
Smartwatch cross - platform compatibility : This DOJ claim is straightforward . By limiting the functionality of Apple Watches with non - iPhone devices , the cause arrogate “ it becomes more costly for that user to buy a different kind of smartphone . ”
Apple, and the wider industry’s, response
Apple come forth an extensive series of rebutter to the DOJ ’s claim Thursday , which you’re able to check out in full detail right here . The core of Apple ’s argument is that regulator are selectively pick metrics that make Apple ’s strength in the smartphone market seem more dominant than it really is , in their view . And in regulating the deportment that the DOJ claims are monopolistic , Apple ’s competitive advantage in the market would be decrease and iPhone customer negatively impact in the process .
“ This lawsuit threatens who we are and the principle that set Apple products apart in fiercely competitive markets . If successful , it would hinder our ability to create the sort of technology people gestate from Apple — where ironware , software system , and services intersect , ” Apple said in a statement allow to TechCrunch
App makers are less vital of the DOJ ’s instance , withthe conglutination for App Fairness ( CAF ) vocalize unassailable support for the DOJ ’s regulative action , which comes as no surprise given several of its members , like Epic Games and Spotify , have already had public disputes with Apple on its App Store practice .
“ The DOJ complaint detail Apple ’s tenacious history of illegal demeanour — clapperclaw their App Store guidelines and developer agreement to increase prices , evoke exorbitant fee , degrade substance abuser experiences , and expire off competition,”CAF Executive Director Rick VanMeter said in a argument Thursday . “ The DOJ joins regulators around the globe , who have recognized the many harms of Apple ’s abusive behavior and are working to address it . ”
What could this mean for iPhone users, and what’s next?
In the prompt term , not much . The release of the lawsuit , and the result back - and - onward between Apple and the DOJ , was a flurry of activity that will take years to settle . The DOJ ’s antimonopoly case against Google , which was filed back in 2020 , get to trial run last year and could still take a couplet more years to arrive at a conclusion .
What you should n’t carry is for the present to toy out like the past . Though the DOJ cites the successful antitrust criminal prosecution against Microsoft in the 1990s , there are many distinctions between the two case , mostly notably a gap between how easily fix Microsoft ’s market say-so was compared to Apple ’s current status quo .
For more on Apple ’s antimonopoly lawsuit , check here :
