Topics
belated
AI
Amazon
Image Credits:IgorIgorevich / Getty Images
Apps
Biotech & Health
Climate
Image Credits:IgorIgorevich / Getty Images
Cloud Computing
commercialism
Crypto
initiative
EVs
Fintech
fundraise
convenience
Gaming
Government & Policy
Hardware
layoff
Media & Entertainment
Meta
Microsoft
concealment
Robotics
Security
Social
Space
startup
TikTok
transportation system
speculation
More from TechCrunch
Events
Startup Battlefield
StrictlyVC
Podcasts
Videos
Partner Content
TechCrunch Brand Studio
Crunchboard
Contact Us
The U.K. governmenthas introduceda fresh beak to Parliament that proposes new legal protections for digital assets such as cryptocurrency , non - fungible tokens ( NFTs ) , and carbon copy credits .
The neb come as the crypto sector contends with a reach of regulative headwinds : In the U.S. , the Securities and Exchange Commission ( SEC ) hasruled that certain crypto assets are securities , and originally this year , the SEC approved the firstU.S.-listed central swop fund ( ETF ) to track Bitcoin . The European Union ( EU ) , meanwhile , is also introducing new laws toregulate cryptocurrency and make transaction easier to hound .
The U.K. isworking on like regulations , but the newProperty ( Digital Assets etc ) Billis more about legitimise digital assets as “ personal property , ” bringing them to a interchangeable footing as traditional assets .
The proposed police force come in answer to a2023 reportfrom the Law Commission that laid out the pauperism to update current effectual preparation around personal property right . The report card noted :
As technology progress and world expend increasing amounts of clock time online , our relationship with digital assets will become ever more important … our recommendations also aim to ensure that the individual law of England and Wales stay a dynamic , globally private-enterprise and flexible tool for securities industry participant in the digital asset space .
The concept of “ personal property ” is important in law , as it plays a primal part in effectual cases relating to bankruptcy , insolvency , theft , inheritance , divorce proceedings , and more . At present , the law in England and Wales ( Scotland and Northern Ireland have distinct legal systems ) legislate around two categories of property : real goods such as gondola , jewelry , and immediate payment , know as “ thing in self-command . ” individually , “ things in activity ” is all about protecting impalpable plus such as shares , debts , and intellectual dimension .
This leave behind a giant spread for “ digital ” asset such as Bitcoin and similar cryptocurrencies , as well asNFTslike digital art ( which havechanged handwriting for considerable sumsin recent geezerhood ) . This new , third category , if pass into law , would make for greater clarity to what plant personal holding and would make it easy for courts to resolve on conflict .
Join us at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
Exhibit at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
For illustration , a royal court could issue a freeze injunction to prevent someone from dissipate a digital plus before a difference of opinion is settle , similar to how the court already does for real product . Or , if someone has their digital plus slip as part of a scam , they could help large legal remedies .
Moreover , such a jurisprudence would mean that digital assets could form part of a person ’s estate for the aim of heritage or bankruptcy proceedings .
What’s next?
The posting was firstpublished in draft formin July , but now it has give the first reading stage in the House of Lords , where it will have to go through various argument and iterations before it progresses to the House of Commons .
There is still some space to go before the Federal Reserve note becomes law , but the U.K. currently count amajority Labour Government , so there is a good likelihood it will eventually be passed — in which form and with which provision , however , is not exonerated .
For example , what will count as a “ digital plus ” under the newfangled legislation ? In possibility , that term covers a broad gamut such as electronic mail accounts and files , carbon credits , and in - biz digital assets . The Law Commissionacknowledgesthis , note there will likely be “ boundary issue ” across the digital plus spectrum . It also recommends a so - call “ common law ” approach , indicating the jurisprudence may have to be test in a motor lodge with the presiding judge rule on a slip - by - shell basis to set precedents on whether an plus in a give case should be give personal property rights .
However , the Ministry of Justice and the Law Commission are absolved that the “ main ” digital plus it sees the law protecting is that of crypto tokens , such as cryptocurrencies and NFTs .
