Topics
Latest
AI
Amazon
Image Credits:Ford
Apps
Biotech & Health
Climate
Image Credits:Ford
Cloud Computing
Commerce
Crypto
Enterprise
EVs
Fintech
Fundraising
Gadgets
Gaming
Government & Policy
Hardware
Layoffs
Media & Entertainment
Meta
Microsoft
concealment
Robotics
security department
societal
blank space
startup
TikTok
deportation
speculation
More from TechCrunch
Events
Startup Battlefield
StrictlyVC
newssheet
Podcasts
Videos
Partner Content
TechCrunch Brand Studio
Crunchboard
Contact Us
Ford announced Thursday that it ’s delaying the output of two electric vehicles , a next - generation EV pickup truck and a three - row EV SUV . The pair are now slated to go far in 2026 and 2027,delaysof one and two geezerhood respectively . In their station , the automaker will be infix hybrid across its U.S. lineup .
Ford ’s chief executive officer has been telegraphing the time lag for months . Last fall , itpostponed$12 billion in planned investment . Then on an pay call in February , CEO Jim Farley say , “ loan-blend will spiel an progressively of import role in our industry ’s transition and will be here for the long trial . ” That ’s the sort of grave talking that shareholders bed to hear .
Wall Street is likely to cheer the move , especially after Toyota describe that its yr - over - year sales event in the United States rise 22 % on the back of strong requirement for hybrids . Ford ’s shift appears designed to pad cash flow and near - term profits , something that seems logical for a company of its size of it , especially in prison term of uncertainty .
But here ’s the thing : Ford is unusual among found automakers in that it performs well when thinking like a inauguration , something it appear to have pack to fondness more of late , EV delay notwithstanding . It succeeds comfortably when it influence the market than when it responds to it .
Most recently , that startup mindset was on display with the Mustang Mach - E , Ford ’s all - electric crossing over . When the EV started taking shape nearly a decade ago , the original plan was to build a dead reasonable crossover powered by an galvanic motor at the front . The design was streamlined , but so uninspiring that one of the company ’s exterior designers questioned who would buy it . Judging by the facial expression of theproposed purpose , those doubts were understandable .
But then - chief executive officer Jim Hackett scrapped the program and give the team just two class to come up with something unexampled . The result was a crossover that has helped Ford claim second place in U.S. EV sale for several quarter in a row .
The Mustang Mach - E was n’t a fluke . Ford has a disk of pulling rabbits out of the hat . In the 1980s , when American car maker were getting shellack by Japanese moment , Ford ditch its boxy , dense designs and conjured up the Taurus , which run on sales event in tardy 1985 . The sleek , roomy and low-priced car was unlike anything American consumer had seen , and it was an immediate hit . Ford sold1 millionof them in the first three years , a succeeder that likely economize the company from bankruptcy .
Join us at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
Exhibit at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
Five year by and by , Ford again pivoted with the founding of the Explorer . SUVs were nothing Modern , but at the fourth dimension most were two - room access models focused on utilitarian tone like tow and off - roading . auto remained the predominant choice among consumers . But by adding rearward door and a sight of brute comforts , Ford transformed the SUV into a family - well-disposed hauler . It might have cannibalized sales of the society ’s cars , but the determination to found the Explorer bear witness prescient : Not only did it power another decade of development for the company , it predict a cosmos where sport utility vehicle dominated the mart .
There are other example , too : Ford used a loyal - and - lean overture whendevelopingthe original Mustang , allow it to delimit an entirely novel category of fast , expensive “ pony cars . ” It did the same after World War II when it produced what ’s now known as the ’ 49 Ford , a car that broke with styling normal and tug the automaker back into the sales jumper cable . And do n’t forget the original Ford assembly line , which while not a product , was definitely a product of entrepreneurial cerebration .
Farley faces different challenges today . His predecessors were fundamentally fuse and matching designs , platforms and manufacture techniques while the heart of each of those vehicles , the railway locomotive , stay largely the same . Electric vehicle challenge producer to pop with a fair slate , or at the very least pull out that heart without losing what made the original vehicle so great .
Ford has excelled at those tasks : The Mustang Mach - E and the F-150 Lightning are by most accounts not just excellent EVs , but excellent vehicles overall .
Still , they have n’t been the runaway successes that Ford await . That ’s in part because they were too expensive — price cuts have proven there ’s still demand for them — and also because the tear substructure to support them stay on underdeveloped . If charging is keep Ford from selling more EVs , maybe it need to come up to the job head on . And if it ca n’t price its electron volt competitively and still make a profit , maybe Ford needs to find a cheesy way to cook up them .
The company has already start down the path , shape a skunkworksled by outmoded - Tesla executive Alan Clarke to modernize a low - price EV . If the squad succeed in bringing a product to food market , some of that startup spirit might be alive at Ford after all .
