Topics
tardy
AI
Amazon
Image Credits:Krisztian Bocsi/Bloomberg / Getty Images
Apps
Biotech & Health
Climate
Image Credits:Krisztian Bocsi/Bloomberg / Getty Images
Cloud Computing
Commerce Department
Crypto
The “Linked Google services” settings menu for Google Account holders.Image Credits:Screenshot by Natasha Lomas/TechCrunch
endeavour
EVs
Fintech
fund-raise
Gadgets
Gaming
Government & Policy
Hardware
Layoffs
Media & Entertainment
Meta
Microsoft
seclusion
Robotics
security system
Social
Space
Startups
TikTok
Transportation
Venture
More from TechCrunch
Events
Startup Battlefield
StrictlyVC
Podcasts
Videos
Partner Content
TechCrunch Brand Studio
Crunchboard
reach Us
Italy ’s competition and consumer watchdog hasannouncedan investigation into how Google catch users ’ consent in rescript to link their action across different services for ad profiling , saying it suspects the adtech giant of “ unfair commercial practices . ”
At matter here is how Google obtains consent from exploiter in the European Union to link their action across its apps and Service — like Google Search , YouTube , Chrome and Maps . link up user activity lets it profile them for advertizing targeting , the company ’s independent source of revenue .
Since early March , Google has been capable to the EU’sDigital market Act(DMA ) , an ex - ante competition government that applies across the European Union , including in Italy . The caller is one of several assign internet “ gatekeepers ” that own and lock a routine of major platforms ( aka “ core platform services ” ) . Other doorkeeper include Amazon , ByteDance , Meta and Microsoft .
The pan - EU regulation is relevant to Italy ’s investigating of Google , since the DMA has made it mandatory for these gatekeepers to obtain consent before they can process users ’ personal data for advertising , or to combine their datum harvested from across their services . The AGCM ’s probe looks like centre on the latter area .
“ [ T]he asking for consent that Google submit to its user to the linking of the services offered may be a misleading and belligerent commercial-grade practice , ” theAGCMwrote in a public press spillage .
“ Indeed , it looks like accompanied by inadequate , incomplete and misleading information and it could work the selection of whether and to what extent consent should be yield . ”
Join us at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
Exhibit at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
The governor ’s action is interesting , since it is typically the European Commission that leads enforcement against these gatekeepers . However , the EC ’s on-going investigating of Google under the DMA , announcedback in March , does not focus on whether it gets consent for linking substance abuser data . The EC has say its DMA probe come to self - preferencing in Google search ; and anti - steering in Google Play .
The Italian dominance looks to be claim the opportunity to playact on concerns the Commission has yet to get around to . A voice for the regulator confirmed it is indue to issue penalties of up to € 10 M if it corroborate unjust commercial practice .
Competition enforcement in the EU and across member states generally purpose to forefend duplicate cause , but in this case , it may be that the Italian governor is picking up the slack water .
A Commission voice told TechCrunch it “ takes note ” of the AGCM investigation into consumer choices implement by Google in copulation to its obligations under the DMA , sum : “ The probe complements enforcement piece of work under the DMA . In implementing the DMA , doorman have to abide by with other relevant EU and interior rules , include but not limited to consumer protection and information protective cover rules . ”
Google’s consent flow under the lens
In its public press release , the AGCM tell it is concerned that Google ’s request to users seeking their consent does not provide them with the information necessary to make a free and informed choice . And when it does , Google ply selective information “ inadequately and imprecisely , ” the AGCM said . Specifically , the regulator mistrust Google is not being limpid about “ the real core ” on users when they accept to their accounts being tie in .
Additionally , the regulator mistrust Google is n’t being open about the full picture . It is worried about the level of information Google provides “ with regard to the variety and number of Google ’s inspection and repair for which ‘ compounding ’ and ‘ fussy - function ’ of personal data may occur , and with respect to the possibility of modulating ( and thus determine ) consent to only some services . ”
The DMA express that consent for linking account for advertising purpose must comply with standards set out in another pan - EU law , the General Data Protection Regulation ( GDPR ) , which stipulates that consent must be “ freely given , specific , informed and unequivocal . ”
The GDPR also sets conditions on how consent can be look for through written statements in an online user interface . It requires such requests to be “ present in a manner which is clearly distinguishable from the other matter , in an intelligible and well accessible form , using clear and plain language . ”
While data aegis authorities normally moderate on enforcement of the GDPR , the DMA ’s internalisation of the former ’s consent standards by reference leads to what we see here : Italy ’s competition and consumer watchdog take stock Google ’s consent flow .
As well as worrying about the info that Google provide users , the AGCM is concerned abouthowGoogle is asking people for their consent . That suggests the “ technique and methods ” it is using for bespeak consent could be a problem , too .
The authority said it suspects Google ’s consent menses “ could check the freedom of pick of the median consumer , ” leading to users being “ induced to take a commercial determination that he / she would not have take otherwise , by consenting to the combination and cross - use of his / her personal data among the plurality of serving offered . ” Or , in fewer words : Google might be manipulating people to agree to connect their business relationship .
Manipulative or so - called “ dark rule ” design has been an inauspicious feature of on-line pick fall for years across all sorts of consumer services . But increasing rule of digital program and services in the EU looks to be challenge the user - hostile tactics at long last .
As well as the DMA referencing GDPR standards for consent , enable more enforcement body to size up choice flows , the bloc ’s Digital Services Act ( DSA ) instantly ban the usance of design that utilise deception or other character of underhand nudges to distort or mar substance abuser ’ power to make destitute pick .
Justlast week , the EU confirmed its first preliminary determination of a breach of the DSA ’s rule against misleading design , when it announced that it suspect the blue check system on X ( formerly Twitter ) of being an illegal dark pattern .
This story was updated with comment from the Commissionand the AGCM.We also corrected a copyediting error to the list of gatekeeper
