Topics
Latest
AI
Amazon
Image Credits:Artur Widak/NurPhoto / Getty Images
Apps
Biotech & Health
Climate
Cloud Computing
Commerce
Crypto
Enterprise
EVs
Fintech
fund-raise
Gadgets
Gaming
Government & Policy
Hardware
Layoffs
Media & Entertainment
Meta
Microsoft
secrecy
Robotics
Security
Social
Space
Startups
TikTok
Transportation
Venture
More from TechCrunch
result
Startup Battlefield
StrictlyVC
Podcasts
Videos
Partner Content
TechCrunch Brand Studio
Crunchboard
Contact Us
In a material exploitation that will likely have a magnanimous wallop on on-line clientele poser , Google isno longer proposingto deprecate third - party tracking cookies in its Chrome browser app . Instead , it looks like suggesting that user should be given a choice to consent or deny advertizement tracking at the web browser degree .
Google ’s move will be open to regulatory oversight in the U.K. , so it is not yet confirmed . Still , it could swan doubt on the uptake ofPrivacy Sandbox , its long - brewing substitute tech stack for personalized advertizing targeting that does not use cooky to track and profile substance abuser .
“ [ W]e are propose an update approach that promote drug user choice . or else of deprecating third - party cookie , we would enclose a unexampled experience in Chrome that lets people make an informed alternative that applies across their WWW browsing , and they ’d be able-bodied to adjust that choice at any sentence . We ’re hash out this new path with regulators , and will engage with the diligence as we roll this out , ” Google ’s VP of Privacy Sandbox , Anthony Chavez , compose in ablog poston Monday .
The adtech giant has been pitching Privacy Sandbox as a less privacy - uncongenial alternative to third - political party cookies . But if Google is n’t ending support for tail cookie after all , there ’s no obvious strong stop or deadline to force advertisers to switch en masse shot to a less intrusive alternative .
It ’s notable the search and advertising giant is not pulling the plug on Privacy Sandbox itself , though . On the contrary , Google ’s blog post say it will keep ferment on the tech stack — Chavez asserted it “ stay important for developers to have privacy - preserving alternative . ”
“ We ’ll continue to make the Privacy Sandbox APIs uncommitted and clothe in them to further improve privacy and public utility . We also intend to offer additional privateness controls , so we plan to introduceIP Protectioninto Chrome ’s Incognito mode , ” he wrote , adding : “ We ’re grateful to all the governance and individuals who have worked with us over the last four yr to develop , examine and adopt the Privacy Sandbox . ”
An unexpected development
On the one hand , Google ’s annunciation is a surprisal , as it has been working toward this stated aim forat least four yearsin response to grow concern ( and reputational risk ) over tracking - based privacy risks . The company actually start out peach about building a “ Privacy Sandbox ” for advert targeting all the wayback in 2019 .
Join us at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
Exhibit at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
On the other hand , something had to give . The caller ’s plan to kill support for track cooky has confront heavy and free burning pushback from advertisers and publishers from the get go . Their complaint triggered close regulative scrutiny inearly 2021 , chiefly from the U.K. ’s competition regulator , the CMA . The U.K. ’s data protection guard dog , the ICO , has also been involved in lapse of Google ’s Privacy Sandbox proposal .
The saga is specially interesting , as it offers a microcosm of argument that seek to frame competition and privacy as opposing forces that are constantly and fatally in latent hostility . In recitation , so far the upshot has been a much slow / delayedtransition — Google has been forced to confabulate and take diligence feedback on proposed changes to its advertizement - serving and tracking mechanism after itagreed to allow the CMAmonitor the designing and carrying out of its substitute adtech stack .
The relative impuissance of the U.K. ’s privacy lapse versus competition enforcement is a key chain here — one that the advertizement industriousness has assay to leverage to their advantage via competition ailment against Privacy Sandbox .
The ICO has been infamously weak at digest up to tag by the ads manufacture , despite the regulator ’s public acknowledgment ( since 2019 ) that cookie - based tracking and profiling dishonor privateness laws . By match competition complaints against concealment rights , the advertizement manufacture has been bank on the CMA to prevail as the regulative hero and deal Google ’s Privacy Sandbox a ping - out blow .
In particular , advertisers take Privacy Sandbox would further intrench Google ’s dominance in the adtech space , as it would then become the proprietor and operator of reconfigured targeting infrastructure design to shield drug user data point from third - party access . In turn , that would make advertisers and publishers even more reliant on Google , even as ( they claim ) the resulting non - cooky - ground advertizing targeting would be less moneymaking for them .
Some publishers havesaid their revenue had decline by about a thirdduring early tests of Google ’s Sandbox . However , if cookie tracking is outlawed because it violates people ’s privacy , some might say the industry ask to be OK with earn a plenty less . ( Breaking the law might be nifty business , but it ’s not legal business sector , yo . )
The ICO separate TechCrunch it ’s “ disappointed ” that Google no longer intends to deprecate third - party cookies in Chrome .
“ From the start of Google ’s Sandbox labor in 2019 , it has been our view that block third - party cookies would be a positive gradation for consumer , ” state the ICO ’s lieutenant commissioner , Stephen Bonner , in a statement . “ The raw plan set out by Google is a significant variety and we will reflect on this new course of action when more detail is uncommitted .
“ Our aspiration to bear the creation of a more privateness - friendly net continues . Despite Google ’s determination , we continue to promote the digital advert industry to move to more individual choice to third - party biscuit — and not to resort to more unintelligible forms of trailing . ”
“ We will monitor how the industry reply and consider regulatory action where systemic non - compliance is identified for all party including Google , ” Bonner added .
We also make out to the CMA about Google ’s move , but it declined to respond to inquiry about whether it would take a proposal to let Chrome users refuse tracking . Instead , it sound out in a statement : “ We will need to cautiously consider Google ’s fresh approach to Privacy Sandbox , working tight with the ICO in this regard , and welcome view on Google ’s revised approach — include possible entailment for consumers and food market outcomes . ”
“ We intervened andput in place commitment in 2022because of concerns that Google ’s Privacy Sandbox proposals could distort challenger by do advertising spend to become even more concentrated on Google ’s ecosystem at the disbursement of its rival , ” the CMA added , emphasizing that competition concerns are its mainstay .
So what happens next?
With the future of Privacy Sandbox ( and much more ) hanging in the balance , Google ’s proposition of a third way that hinge on centering consumer option could offer the two U.K. regulators an elegantly simple — if ironic — way out of this competition versus privacy impasse : Just rent the user make up one’s mind !
It ’s ironic because had the ICOactuallyenforced data point protection police force on the adtech industry in the first position , the diligence would already have had to ask and obtain people ’s consent to cut through and profile them .
Instead , we ’ve had year ofconsent theater , where the vane has been flood with plaguy ( and illegal ) pappa - ups that employ deceptive mechanisms to confuse , manipulate or simply slip consent — doing everything except presenting users with the clean-cut and informed choiceU.K. and EU laws require .
All these year of adtech secrecy outrages are fundamentally water under the bridge at this point , but the future direction of the WWW ( and the business models it confirm ) is still up for grab . The next few months — and what this pair of U.K. regulators resolve — will be important .
In ablog postdiscussing Google ’s gambit , seclusion and security measure researcherLukasz Olejnikhas sketched a mock - up of a potential choice screen Chrome could present to user . Does he think the CMA would accept Google implementing such a choice ?
“ That depends on the developments in the next two months , but I ca n’t conceive of regulator not give users an choice of choice , ” he told TechCrunch . “ That would be gonzo . And perhaps this is why Google hold , at least today , that Privacy Sandbox is here to stay . But there must be an incentive to shift to the use of PS . If there is none , why keep it ? ”
But would an unblockable prompt in Chrome that enquire users to opt whether they see advert base on their web action ( or not ) , or deny ad tracking all told by disabling third - party cookies , found a profits for consumers hoping for more privacy ? “ I hope so , ” Olejnik say , hint that there ’s a chance “ substance abuser choice may thus steer the future . ”
