Topics
later
AI
Amazon
Image Credits:Getty Images
Apps
Biotech & Health
Climate
Image Credits:Getty Images
Cloud Computing
commercialism
Crypto
Grammarly’s new voice profile feature, which uses generative AI to match the style of a person’s writing.Image Credits:Grammarly
endeavor
EVs
Fintech
fund-raise
Gadgets
Gaming
Government & Policy
Hardware
layoff
Media & Entertainment
Meta
Microsoft
concealment
Robotics
certificate
Social
Space
Startups
TikTok
Transportation
Venture
More from TechCrunch
Events
Startup Battlefield
StrictlyVC
newssheet
Podcasts
Videos
Partner Content
TechCrunch Brand Studio
Crunchboard
touch Us
As generative AI becomes embedded in the platform we use every day , debates are swirling around who should get credit — and compensation — for AI - generate works .
YouTube is in theprocessof hashing out licensing understanding with record book label to utilise musicians ’ voices to create new euphony in their styles . Meanwhile , some art - generating AI program arefiguringoutwaysto pay artist for their donation to the data used to train the platforms ’ AI models .
But what about text ? Should — and if so , howshould — writers be recognize and remunerated for AI - generated works that mimic their voices ?
“ Because Grammarly works across apps and tools , we can understand a user ’s alone style and preferences in the places they communicate to bring forth a personalized profile , ” Tal Oppenheimer , head of mathematical product for Grammarly ’s client apps , told TechCrunch in an email audience . “ We beget a person ’s visibility as they passively use our Cartesian product . ”
Oppenheimer says that each visibility , which comes with an AI - generated verbal description that highlights what Grammarly attend as the define characteristics of the person ’s style ( e.g. “ positive , ” “ encouraging ” ) , can be customized to a sure degree . Users can discard element such as feeling and vogue option — say , a tendency to use fighting vocalization and chemical compound time — that they believe do n’t accurately reflect the way they write .
“ As this is the first release of our personalised voice features , we ’ll carry on to refine them over time and consider ways to make them even more personalised to customers and their needs , ” Oppenheimer said .
Join us at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
Exhibit at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
Grammarly pitches the tech as a way for writers to leverage circumstance to “ make [ their ] save sound more personal . ” Butthiswriter occupy about how it might be used in considerably less benevolent direction .
suppose a companionship tap a Grammarly voice visibility while a writer ’s on leave — or after they ’ve been let go — to publish web log spot under their byline without their favorable reception and without compensating them . Or , visualize a Grammarly voice visibility being used to impersonate someone in a sophisticated phishing attempt .
Grammarly is n’t the first to bring to the fore the issue of writer protections where they pertain to generative AI , of trend . Thousandsof author recently signed an open letter decrying generative AI technologies that “ mime and regurgitate ” their “ language , stories , style and idea . ” Writers in California and New York , meanwhile , have go a step further , suingAI inauguration OpenAI — which they say trained school text - render AI on their body of work without permission — over alleged IP theft .
Now , to be average to Grammarly , not just anyone can get at a Grammarly voice visibility . At least at launching , private user can only expend their like phonation profile — not anyone else ’s . And they ca n’t be export .
For her part , Oppenheimer try that voice profile “ are n’t designed to replace anybody . ”
“ Rather than copy them , [ voice profiles ] avail [ writers ] learn about how they vocalise , create more personalized production and write in a more authentic way . ”
Call me doubting , but I ’m very mistrustful .
Personalized voice detection and app joins Grammarly ’s other generative AI feature , many of which are participate general availableness this week . The society , which has more than 30 million users and over 70,000 teams on its platform , says that users are creating over 12 million pieces of content every week with the features .
