Topics
in style
AI
Amazon
Image Credits:Tesla
Apps
Biotech & Health
Climate
Image Credits:Tesla
Cloud Computing
Department of Commerce
Crypto
Enterprise
EVs
Fintech
Fundraising
Gadgets
game
Government & Policy
Hardware
layoff
Media & Entertainment
Meta
Microsoft
Privacy
Robotics
surety
societal
outer space
startup
TikTok
Transportation
Venture
More from TechCrunch
issue
Startup Battlefield
StrictlyVC
Podcasts
video
Partner Content
TechCrunch Brand Studio
Crunchboard
Contact Us
Attorneys for Elon Musk intend to move to dismiss a case that accuses the Tesla CEO , who is also the top dog ofPresident Donald Trump ’s DOGE brass , of using AI - sire , copyright - outrage “ Blade Runner”-inspired images at a Tesla military press issue .
In a filingsubmitted to the U.S. District Court Central District of California , Western Division late Tuesday , lawyer for Musk aver both Musk and Tesla , which is also named as a defendant in the suit , will move to dismiss “ all claims ” for ministration with prejudice . “ With prejudice ” is a effectual term meaning that a case is dissolve permanently , and ca n’t be refiled .
The complainant in the suit , Alcon Entertainment , mean to play off the gesture , per the filing .
In October , Alcon , the production company behind the 2017 film “ Blade Runner 2049 , ” file the case against Musk , Tesla , and Warner Bros. Discovery ( WBD ) for what it claim was a willful circumvention of its IP right hand .
agree to Alcon ’s complaint , Musk and WBD asked to use imagery from “ Blade Runner 2049 ” topromote Tesla ’s futuristic concept carshours before their unveiling on a Warner studio apartment lot . When Alcon would n’t agree to provide the rights through WBD , the case allege that Tesla , at Musk ’s counseling , source that imagery as raw material to repeat it using an AI simulation . No specific AI fashion model is bring up in the suit ( yet ) .
Musk thenshowed this allegedly phoney “ Blade Runner ” imageryduring the case while talking about the film itself .
Alcon also claims in its complaint that it was never made privy to any of the agreements between Tesla and WBD that would ’ve been necessary before Tesla ’s presser . The yield company ’s suit proposes banning Tesla from further distributing the disputed promotional cloth , as well as unspecified damages — although the complaint also notes that misdemeanor under the U.S. Copyright Act can be up to $ 150,000 per violation , and it cater a further price estimation that is higher :
Join us at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
Exhibit at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
“ Based on past factual sword affiliation contracts for automotive partners on BR2049 [ BladeRunner 2049 ] , Tesla belike would have had to make significant expenditures — at least in the mid - six - public figure ( at least $ 500,000 ) and possibly into the eight trope ( $ 10 million or more ) to obtain a BR2049 brand affiliation with Tesla and the [ society ’s ] cybercab [ robotaxi ] at market value , if Alcon had even been uncoerced to do it at all , ” reads the original ailment filed by Alcon ’s effectual team . “ The right of first publication misdemeanor here facilitated allowing Tesla to preserve this outlay . ”
