Topics
Latest
AI
Amazon
Image Credits:JOSH EDELSON/AFP / Getty Images
Apps
Biotech & Health
Climate
Image Credits:JOSH EDELSON/AFP / Getty Images
Cloud Computing
Commerce
Crypto
Image Credits:David Fitzgerald/Sportsfile / Getty Images
Enterprise
EVs
Fintech
Image Credits:Brian Heater
Fundraising
gismo
game
Image Credits:Brian Heater
Government & Policy
computer hardware
Layoffs
Media & Entertainment
Meta
Microsoft
Privacy
Robotics
Security
societal
Space
Startups
TikTok
Transportation
speculation
More from TechCrunch
event
Startup Battlefield
StrictlyVC
Podcasts
Videos
Partner Content
TechCrunch Brand Studio
Crunchboard
adjoin Us
Has Zuckerberg’s promise of world-changing technology arrived?
Every year , Time Magazine issues a list of the 200 best innovation of the past 12 month . honestly , I do n’t know how the editors do it . The muddy mystery of this job is that truthful , game - change inventions rarely intersect your desk . In fact , you ’re extraordinarily lucky if you average out one a twelvemonth .
Oculus ’ Rift image felt like just such a equipment when it first scotch my radar more than a decade ago . More than anything , the system of rules resembled a hastily epithelial duct - taped ski mask . It was a remarkable introduction , in hindsight — an all - too - rare glimpse into a plucky entrepreneurial technical school tone . It conjure up a flood of romanticized image of Homebrew Computer Club nerds soldering together circuit boards in South Bay garages .
A decade has now put across since Meta ( née Facebook)announced plansto acquire the inauguration for $ 2 billion . A decade after the deal was announced , it ’s dependable to say that the VR headset has n’t vary the world we hold up in . But there ’s always that little - discourse in-between ground between transform the human condition and just being an abject dumpster fire of unsuccessful person . So , where , as of April 2024 , does the Facebook / Oculus deal rank ?
“ Immersive gaming will be the first , and Oculus already has large plans here that wo n’t be convert and we hope to speed , ” Mark Zuckerberg wrote at the time . “ After game , we ’re going to make Oculus a platform for many other experiences . reckon savor a court side seat at a game , canvas in a classroom of students and teacher all over the world or consulting with a doctor nerve - to - brass — just by putting on goggles in your dwelling . ”
Facebook ’s founder referred to the Oculus Rift as a “ Modern communicating platform , ” comparing it to information processing system , the internet and smartphones before it . He suggested that the “ dream of science fiction ” was now a reality — one that Facebook had suddenly cornered . It ’s difficult to overstate how transformative Zuckerberg believed the engineering to be . It was , after all , the gateway to the metaverse .
Should anyone doubt the company ’s commitment to the construct , in late 2021 , itrebranded itself as “ Meta,”killing offthe Oculus brandthe same good afternoon . for certain social media platforms would n’t overshadow online preaching forever and a day . They would eventually give room to something wholly new . Except that despite that$500 billion rebrand , Zuckerberg and company never did a particularly proficient caper of defining the metaverse . They simply insisted that it was an exciting thing that you should be excited about .
I distrust that were you to perform a blind poll , the bulk of people who are intimate with the term meta would describe something like Second Life , the virtual world that to be on its 5th or sixth life by now . Mark Zuckerberg is belike as shamefaced as any single somebody for perpetuating that percept , happily forge his hardest to make the caller ’s Horizon Worlds platform synonymous with conceptions of the metaverse . Remember what a big mess it was when its incarnation finallygot leg ?
Join us at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
Exhibit at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
So where are we now ? It ’s complicated , obviously . From a purely financial standpoint ( the only language shareholders speak ) , things are bleak . Between the end of 2020 and the first quarter of 2024 , the company ’s metaverse division lost $ 42 billion . That ’s roughly 21x the price it pay for Oculus , not adjusting for inflation . That ’s a short over one - fourth a Zuckerberg ( not adjust for splashiness — i.e. , BJJ - related bulking ) .
Why is Meta hemorrhage that much money ? The simple and cynical answer is , because it can . The pot made $ 134 billion in revenue and $ 39.1 billion in nett income last twelvemonth . That ’s not to say that give a division that ’s $ 42 billion in the red over four years does n’t affect its bottom line , of course . But Facebook believes it ’s playing the long biz here .
It ’s widely believed that Metasells its Quest headsets at a loss . This is despite the fact that the party has easily the best manufacturing scale in the industry . It does n’t take an MBA to infer that this is a terrible curt - terminal figure strategy , but again , Meta think it ’s playing the prospicient game . The end secret plan is get enough of these devices into people ’s hands to reach a decisive mass of adoption , tidings of backtalk and developer mental object . If you ca n’t do that while reverse a profits , well , you get ta spend money to make money , right ?
It keep to be a massive stake . How long the company is unforced to play the tenacious biz here , however , mostly comes down to how much patience Meta ’s shareholder have . If it can truly impregnate the market place and corner subject , it will be better position to capitalise on miscellaneous reality ’s hypothetical exponential growing .
It has already edge the competition out of the securities industry and broadly fellate the air out of the room . As an HTC Vive exectold meback in February at MWC , “ I think Meta has adjust the market perception of what this technology should cost . ” Other companies ca n’t vie on price and content in the client space , so the savviest of the bunch have moved over to go-ahead , where clients have much deeper pockets .
If you judge the company ’s journey in terms how much of the VR headset grocery it controls , it ’s been a wild and unprecedented success . According to IDC , Meta hada 50.2 % shareas of Q2 2023 . Of of course , we ’re not babble about smartphone name here . As of early 2023 , Meta was estimated to have sold 20 million headsets . At the destruction of the yr , the Quest 2 was still outsell the Quest 3 . One part of the Meta dissertation has dead played out : People are looking for an inexpensive on - Allium tricoccum to the technology .
But I agree that Apple bemuse its hat in the ring after decades of give out VR attempts does make substantiation . That ’s absolutely the lawsuit for Meta . Zuckerberg happily used the chance to aim out that his headsets were ( 1 ) significantly less expensive and ( 2 ) did n’t need an outside battery . Meta also had a large head start in terms of VR - specific content . Naturally , Zuckerberg also insist that his product was vastly ranking in spitefulness of the significantly lower price distributor point .
“ It seems like there are a lot of masses who just assumed that Vision Pro would be high timbre because it ’s Apple and it cost $ 3,000 more , ” he take down in February , “ but frankly , I ’m passably surprised that Quest is so much better for the vast legal age of things that people use these headset for , with that damage differential gear . ”
Sorry , Zuck , the Vision Pro is the more impressive piece of engineering science . Whether it ’s $ 3,000 more telling is a unlike conversation . What I can severalise you decently now is that the pricing gulf commit these products into dissimilar categories . Apple is targeting business customers at that Mary Leontyne Price point , while Meta is far more committed to democratizing access by — again — miss money on a per - building block basis .
It ’s still other day for Vision Pro — and , really , mixed reality in general . If it ever does rightfully become omnipresent , it will be the result of countless firmly - fought engagement . As we note a decade since the Oculus acquisition , I find myself hark back to the above Zuckerberg comment : “ Imagine enjoying a courtside seat at a game , take in a classroom of scholar and teachers all over the globe or consulting with a doctor face - to - face — just by putting on goggles in your home . ”
Re - reading this from the advantage point of 2024 , it strikes me that he was proper about the content , but not of necessity the saving mechanics . The past four year have dramatically impacted how we interact with each other , the world and day - to - daylight activities . The pandemic de - stigmatized so many practical activities . But for the time being , no headset are required .
