Topics
late
AI
Amazon
Image Credits:Tesla
Apps
Biotech & Health
Climate
Image Credits:Tesla
Cloud Computing
Department of Commerce
Crypto
Enterprise
EVs
Fintech
Fundraising
gadget
Gaming
Government & Policy
Hardware
layoff
Media & Entertainment
Meta
Microsoft
privateness
Robotics
Security
Social
blank
inauguration
TikTok
Transportation
speculation
More from TechCrunch
Events
Startup Battlefield
StrictlyVC
newssheet
Podcasts
telecasting
Partner Content
TechCrunch Brand Studio
Crunchboard
Contact Us
Tesla ’s attempt to trademark the term “ Robotaxi ” in book of facts to its vehicles has been turn down by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for being too generic , according to a new filing . Another applications programme by Tesla to brand the terminus “ Robotaxi ” for its forthcoming drive - hailing service isstill under examinationby the part .
In addition , applicationsfromTesla for the trademark on the full term “ Cybercab ” have been halted due to other troupe pursuing similar “ Cyber ” trademark . That includesone companythat has applied for numerous trademarks related to aftermarket Cybertruck accessories .
The USPTOissuedTuesday what ’s known as a “ nonfinal office action mechanism ” on the “ Robotaxi ” stylemark lotion , which mean Tesla has three month to file a response or the office will abandon the applications programme . A trademark attorney representing Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment .
Teslaappliedfor the earmark in October 2024 on the same day that itrevealed the Cybercab , the aim - make galvanising automobile that it hope to one Clarence Shepard Day Jr. use in its planned sovereign ride - hailing religious service . Tesla also submit two interchangeable trademark app October 10 for the terminal figure “ Robobus , ” which are still under examination .
The stylemark that was decline was assigned to a USPTO examiner on April 14 . Tesla say it would use the word in reference book to “ [ l]and vehicle ; electric vehicles , namely automobiles ; automobiles ; and structural part therefor , ” according to the original app .
While the USPTO tester regain there were no conflicting stylemark in existence , it refused the program because it was “ merely descriptive . ” The examiner wrote that the terminus “ Robotaxi ” is “ used to key like goods and armed service by other party . ”
“ [ S]uch wording is likely generic in the context of use of applier ’s goods and/or help , ” the examiner pen .
Join us at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
Exhibit at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
The inspector also write that Tesla will demand to enjoin the USPTO if “ competition ” use the terms “ ROBO , ROBOT , or ROBOTIC to advertise like good and/or services . ”
Tesla ’s other lotion for the “ Robotaxi ” trademark would brood the use of the word when offering transportation Robert William Service , including “ organise travel arrangement for individuals and for groups , ” “ arranging time - based ridesharing services , ” and put up vehicle sharing or rentals . That coating was also specify to a USPTO inspector on April 14 , but no conclusion has been register .
This taradiddle has been updated to include info about the “ Cybercab ” trademark applications .
