Topics
former
AI
Amazon
Image Credits:David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Apps
Biotech & Health
Climate
Image Credits:David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Cloud Computing
mercantilism
Crypto
enterprisingness
EVs
Fintech
fund raise
Gadgets
back
Government & Policy
Hardware
Layoffs
Media & Entertainment
Meta
Microsoft
Privacy
Robotics
certificate
societal
blank space
Startups
TikTok
Transportation
Venture
More from TechCrunch
Events
Startup Battlefield
StrictlyVC
Podcasts
Videos
Partner Content
TechCrunch Brand Studio
Crunchboard
Contact Us
The lawgiver behind California ’s late vetoed AI pecker , SB 1047 , is going down dangle .
For months , Silicon Valley debated whetherSB 1047would have a chilling burden on California ’s AI boom or would protect against catastrophic harms from modern AI systems . The reply never became clear , since California governor Gavin Newsomdecided it was the awry coming , vetoing the bill on Sunday before it became jurisprudence .
Now California state senator Scott Wiener tells TechCrunch that some Silicon Valley institutions spread an unprecedented level of “ misinformation ” about SB 1047 in the months leading up to the veto . ( Folks outside of Silicon Valleyalso criticise SB 1047 , including Nancy Pelosi and the U.S. Department of Commerce . )
“ I ’ve had ruffianly bills before , and bill where there have been misinformation . I ’ve never had a bill with this level of misinformation , ” Wiener told TechCrunch . “ There was a whole propaganda campaign . ”
Wiener specifically criticizedY Combinator and Andreessen Horowitz executives for assist spreada narrative that SB 1047 would send startup founder to jail . This is not technically fictitious ; theoretically , a developer who lied on AI safety reports that SB 1047 would have need could have gone to gaol for committing perjury . But that would only have materialise if a developer had lie .
Indeed , some in the technical school diligence helped spread that estimation . In June , Y Combinator CEO Garry Tansigned a letterto California lawmakers claiming that “ AI computer software developers could go to jail ” under SB 1047 . Earlier that same calendar month , Andreessen Horowitz cooperator Anjney Midha say ina podcastthat “ no rational inauguration founder or academic researcher is going to risk jail time or fiscal laying waste just to advance the state of the art in AI . ”
“ A16Z was , I think , at the heart of a mass of the opposition to the broadsheet , ” Wiener said .
Join us at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
Exhibit at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
Y Combinator ’s head of public policy , Luther Lowe , tells TechCrunch that the debate around SB 1047 is not as clear cut as Wiener makes it out to be .
“ The semantic argument alone demonstrate the challenges with bills like SB 1047 being undefined and open - ended , ” said Lowe in an e-mail .
Andreessen Horowitz pointed TechCrunch toward a letter its chief legal officer wrote month earlier when Wiener made similar claim , state that SB 1047 “ is a deeply worrisome and primal departure from the way package development has been regulate in this land . ”
Another claim Wiener called out as misinformation was that SB 1047 would push AI startups out of California . Wiener take startup across the country would have been affected as by SB 1047 , as long as they did business concern in California .
OpenAI chief scheme police officer Jason Kwon compose aletter to Newsomin August posit that SB 1047 would advertise California ’s entrepreneurs out of the commonwealth . The Chamber of Progress — a Big Tech trade group exemplify Meta , Apple , and Google — also has a similarclaim on its website .
Wiener also make a jab at Fei - Fei Li , who many call the godmother of AI , for write alleged inaccuracy about SB 1047 in an Augustopinion composition for Fortune cartridge holder . At the time , Li wrote that receptive source programme that developers download and construct with could be shut out down by the original AI simulation supplier under SB 1047 . A enceinte part of the debate around SB 1047 was how it would touch the opened seed ecosystem .
“ It was lechatelierite exonerated in the bill that you ’re only required to shut down a role model if it is in your willpower , ” Wiener say . “ And yet , Fei - Fei Li put that inaccurate statement in her piece . She ’s very well esteem , so it was inauspicious . ”
Li did not at once respond to TechCrunch ’s postulation for comment .
finally , SB 1047 ’s author took outlet with Newsom ’s missive explain why he vetoed the visor , saying the regulator “ did not do justness in describing the government note . ” Newsom for sure did give an unexpected reason for his veto , allege SB 1047 should have aim more AI good example .
“ By concentre only on the most expensive and large - musical scale models , SB 1047 establishes a regulative framework that could give the public a imitation sense of surety about controlling this tight - moving applied science , ” said Newsomin the letter . “Smaller , specialized framework may come forth as equally or even more dangerous than the model targeted by SB 1047 — at the likely expense of curb the very innovation that fuels advancement in favour of the public good . ”
Many , include Newsom , have criticized SB 1047 in the yesteryear for being overly burdensome , so it was passably surprising to see the governor indicate that the bank bill should have a more pliant framework that would cover more AI models .
Regardless of its loser to become legal philosophy this time around , Wiener say SB 1047 supercharged the conversation around AI safety machine in California . On Sunday , Newsom announced a new chore force-out with Li and other research worker to build up safety rail for creditworthy AI evolution . The state alsopassed 18 other jurisprudence regulating AIin September .
Wiener is not ruling out the opening that he ’ll return next year with a revamped variation of SB 1047 .
“ It ’s too shortly to say exactly what we ’re going to do , ” Wiener tell . “ We ’re perfectly committed to promoting AI safety . ”
