Topics
late
AI
Amazon
Image Credits:champc / Getty Images
Apps
Biotech & Health
mood
Image Credits:champc / Getty Images
Cloud Computing
Commerce
Crypto
Image Credits: Twilio
Enterprise
EVs
Fintech
Image Credits: Twilio
Fundraising
Gadgets
gage
Government & Policy
Hardware
layoff
Media & Entertainment
Meta
Microsoft
Privacy
Robotics
protection
Social
infinite
Startups
TikTok
Department of Transportation
Venture
More from TechCrunch
Events
Startup Battlefield
StrictlyVC
Podcasts
telecasting
Partner Content
TechCrunch Brand Studio
Crunchboard
Contact Us
Twilio by most accounts would be considered a startup success story . But after top out at $ 400 a share in September 2021 , when everyone was riding fantasy valuation , the company has experienced a long plunge to around $ 66 a share . That kind of performance incline to get the attention of activist investor , so perhaps it ’s no surprise that Anson Funds and Legion Partners are reportedlyturning the screwson the company .
The communications API party appear to be reacting to that insistence by issue monetary value , which in corporate speak translates intolaying off another 5%of its workforce Monday morning . As the stock price has come , so has the number of employees ; the annunciation comes a little over a year after the troupe cut11 % of the workforcein September 2022 and17 % in February2023 .
But this round seems more like Twilio is throwing the activist dogs a bone by showing it could get even leaner still . Laying mass off during the vacation is n’t a great look , but with investors breathing down its cervix , perhaps the executive team feel it had little choice .
At the meridian of its rating , Twilio made some big moves . In 2018 , it purchasedSendGrid for $ 2 billion , and in 2021 it buy customer information political platform Segmentfor $ 3.2 billion . Both moves were design to fuse customer data with the communication theory data the company was amass via its core communications APIs .
Whether that worked is still open to debate , but with the caudex price in the $ 60s , it feel spendthrift in retrospect . At the metre with so much value , it was worth trying to thrive the company ’s capabilities . Today , not so much .
With two activists putting on the insistency , and the stock cost dump , it leave the company in a vulnerable position . This battle feels more like Zendesk ’s , which ended up being deal offto secret fairness , than Salesforce ’s , where it ultimatelyfended off its militant .
The large question here is whether the dramatically low stock cost , the confutable acquisitions and other bad financial data points mean this is a case where the activists have a point . And if they do , what does it mean for Twilio ?
Join us at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
Exhibit at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
Activists mixing it up
Any fashion you front at it , the company has faced peachy instability of late . chief executive officer Jeff Lawson announced in February that he wassplitting the company into two units . He name Elena Donio to launch the data and apps side of the house , which includes Segment . She announced that she would bestepping downlater this calendar month during the company ’s Q3 2023 net profit call .
Patrick Gadson , a mate at the law firm Vinson & Elkins , wonder whether the activist were at least partly responsible for her divergence .
“ I do n’t know why you would name someone to be the psyche of one of two major business concern segment where you have this big restructuring promulgation in February , and then in December announce that she ’s resigning and the CEO was expire to be the interim head of data and program , ” Gadson told TechCrunch+ . “ That to me is very unusual , and is uniform with the sorts of thing that bump once an activist first agitating for modification in the backcloth , and makes sealed suggestion , quote , unquote , slash threat . ”
Meanwhile , CFO Aidan Viggiano , speaking at the UBS Global Technology Conference last month , very bluntly put forward that the heart communication job is worth about 90 % of the company ’s tax income , while the apps and data point job is upright for just 12 % .
Gadson think that variety of candour might have been careful . “ If I were stagnant position on not selling the data and applications business , and there had been agitating by the [ activist firms ] to trade it , I probably would n’t be stating publicly , ‘ Hey , it ’s not even that much of our revenue , guy cable . ’ ”
Do the activists have a point?
When we have seen software company wind up under the hammer of activistic interposition , a few commonality emerge .
First , slowing tax revenue outgrowth . secondly , a cost base that external parties consider excessive . And , perhaps , a loss of stress .
Twilio ’s current status and activist involvement thereof make all three notes at once : The caller ’s emergence has slowed to a Australian crawl , it has clearly had supererogatory costs baked into its results historically , and , given that the common people beating on Twilio ’s door want it to dispose of sure assets , it could focus more .
A very simple , commonsense reading of the situation is that the activists have a point . However , Twilio is not quite the underperformer that the situation makes it out to be . Let ’s run through the activist perspective , and then mount a defense of what Twilio is endeavor to do next .
The activist case
Starting with development , Twilio ’s revenue development has all but halted . What follows is a chart fromTwilio ’s Q3 2023 earnings , exhibit its entire revenues back through Q3 of 2021 :
The chart details two pith upshot : Twilio has grownverymodestly since the closing of 2022 , and its development rate — the gray business line that points toward the basement — has slipped in every quarter in late memory . deadening ontogenesis that is also slow is a arduous thing to excuse away for a public company .
Doubly so when folks think that the caller in inquiry was overspending for underperformance . To reach its tax income growth deceleration , Twilio has systematically reduced its costs . That ’s to say that it was likely spending far too much when time were expert and is now dealing with that expense cornerstone since increase is harder to accomplish . Again , not a great tone for a management squad .
On the price point , even after monumental cost reductions in the flesh of laid - off stave , Twilio is still unprofitable today . In Q3 2023 , the company lost $ 108.9 million on an engage basis and $ 141.7 million on a net basis .
Twilio has lots of adjusted gain to report , as is often the case among technical school companies . But given its note value decline in recent geezerhood , it does n’t appear that a sound glob of familiarized operating income is really seduce investors happy : To reach that build , Twilio has to strip out $ 185 million worth of share - based compensation it doled out in its most recent stern .
And unlike its development rate , the direction of the fraction of revenue that Twilio spends on pay its staff in shares that thin its common fairness holders is not head down and to the right . Again , from its Q3 2023 pack of cards :
Don’talltech troupe that are not state - nation sizing like to strip out their share - based comprehensive cost ? Sure , but that does n’t have in mind that investor like it , as they are being told that the costs that impact them straight off — through dilution — do n’t look . So when a technical school troupe turns around and enounce , “ Hey , we ’re going to rebuy a bunch of our caudex , ” all it ’s saying is that it will work to undo a portion of the damage it already did to the stakes its backers have held . Notthatenticing anymore , right ?
Then there ’s the interrogation of focussing . Twilio ’s Segment leverage that we bring up is part of the company ’s data point and coating ( TD&A ) revenue bucket . Driving around one in every eight dollar bill of Twilio revenue today , TD&A grew at a 9 % rate in the third quarter . That ’s sound than the 5 % that Twilio ’s much larger communications business contend but is scarce enough to mess up the doors off the company ’s b . you may see why investors might want that to get spun out or sell to beget some possible returns for their own holdings .
That said , is it worth the trouble ?
In Twilio’s defense
Twilio ’s core patronage has escort its growth slow down , but not due to its products short not being an attractive offer to potential customers . Read the following riff from Khozema Shipchandler , the leader of the Twilio communications business , in the company’slast earnings call :
Our Q3 dollar - based last expanding upon charge per unit for communication was 101 % , and 104 % excluding crypto customer . Similar to last quarter , new client are drive a neat luck of the overall increase , while crypto and social and messaging headwinds mask the success we are see to it with our cross - sell and expansion opportunities . Churn continues to remain relatively stable , and we are seeing year - over - year loudness ontogeny across many industries .
recollect that Twilio was an early drawing card in on - demand pricing , which mean that the more its customers use its product , the more money it induce . As noted , Twilio is supply new customers but project impuissance from prior accounts , which pushes it nearer and closer to flat maturation . The economy is not great in every sphere ; a company of Twilio ’s scale is pass away to see uneven results from dissimilar client segments .
The same folks who sleep with Twilio ’s role model when it was place up astounding results are now somewhat sullen on it . The counterargument here is that as Twilio expands its customer base , it is setting itself up for very healthy growth down the road .
And with a smaller cost base to kick . Twilioisnow minuscule than it was . In Q3 2023 , its spend on R&D , G&A and S&M were lower than year - anterior totals . If client requirement picks up , not only is Twilio in a great place to grow with a tumid issue of customers — 306,000 active explanation in Q3 2023 vs. 280,000 in Q3 2022 — but it will also enjoy those gains with nifty lucrativeness leverage , given its smaller toll cornerstone .
Bullish , veracious ? It ’s not a hard case to make . But all the study we ’ve done arguing in favor of Twilio thus far does n’t let in the material elephant in the way : section .
What to make of that purchase , and its less - than - anticipated impact on Twilio ’s emergence ? A few things hail to mind . First , Twilio ’s overall growth pace would be lower without it , which intend itishelping its parent ship’s company wield growth to a modest grade . That matters .
Second , Segment is probably only worth so much in the issue of a sale . The intact TD&A chemical group at Twilio did $ 127 million in gross in the third fourth part , frame it on a run pace of just over a half - billion dollars per twelvemonth . grow at 9 % , it ’s deserving around three or four sentence that material body . If Twilio sold it at that price , or spin it out at a interchangeable equity rating , it would unlock about one - one-eighth of the troupe ’s current market cap in the operation . That ’s enough cash to run Twilio ’s part repurchasing cause , sure , but is that enough to make up for the gross expiration and growth retardation ? It sounds like a quite a little of pain in the ass for footling triumph , frankly .
And there ’s the chance that Twilio ’s leading is right and that keeping Segment will unlock a lot of future ontogenesis . The company lately announced something call CustomerAI , which it described to investor as a “ set of prognostic and generative capabilities that pairs customer datum with large speech manakin to give companies AI that truly knows their customers . ” We care about that when it descend to Segment because Twilio ’s chief operating officer thinks that “ Segment ’s capability are foundational to CustomerAI . ” And given that AI requires good data , and CDPs are all about pile up turgid amounts of valuable data , it ’s reasonable to assume this could generate more revenue down the road for Segment .
If Twilio were to go through the work of ripping Segment from its business sector , the financial gains are only so big with incertain financial downside to its continued operations . Even more , Twilio could be left with less of an AI future in other 2024 . That sounds like a very hazardous proposition .
All Twilio necessitate to get pesky investor to still and go by is stronger customer spend from its ever - larger client base . And some grounds that CustomerAI , lean on Segment , is drive real growth for its concern . It may simply ask a few more quarter to show both . In the meantime , we are sympathetic with investor impatient for a paying back to boom - era Twilio share prices , but the architectural plan they are bear on does n’t seem accretive and come with enough risk to be a flake silly in total .
Not that we desire to fight down multi - billion - dollar businesses , as they rarely need any sort of external boosterism . But in our analysis of this deal from a numbers linear perspective , Twilio is belike an reverse Brexit . It really is better together .
Update : This taradiddle has been update to reverberate the right timing of the announcement of Elena Donio ’s exit from the ship’s company , and to set the telephone number of Twilio active customers accounts from 360,000 to 306,000 as of the end of Q3 2023 .
