Topics
Latest
AI
Amazon
Image Credits:Apple
Apps
Biotech & Health
Climate
Image Credits:Apple
Cloud Computing
Commerce
Crypto
Previous major antitrust cases.Image Credits:Bernstein
Enterprise
EVs
Fintech
Fundraising
gadget
punt
Government & Policy
Hardware
layoff
Media & Entertainment
Meta
Microsoft
secrecy
Robotics
certificate
Social
Space
inauguration
TikTok
transfer
speculation
More from TechCrunch
effect
Startup Battlefield
StrictlyVC
Podcasts
Videos
Partner Content
TechCrunch Brand Studio
Crunchboard
get hold of Us
The U.S. Department of Justicefiled a cause against AppleThursday , accusing the fellowship led by CEO Tim Cook of engaging in anticompetitive patronage practices . The allegations include claim that Apple prevents competitors from accessing certain iPhone features and that the company ’s action impact the “ flow of speech ” through its cyclosis service , Apple TV+ .
However , even if the DOJ try any of the allegations , it is extremely unlikely that Apple will face material changes for age , as account shows that such lawsuits often take a important amount of time to reach test , let alone a resolution . The DOJ ’s on-going vitrine against Google , lodge in 2020 , only went to trial in 2023 , with no remedy or financial deduction wait for up to two more years .
This is not the first time Apple has look legal military action from the DOJ . In 2012 , the agencysued Applefor conspiring with publisher to increase atomic number 99 - book cost , a suit that wasnot settled until 2016 .
“ Precedents suggest that solving of the charge will take three to five age , including appeals , ” Bernstein analysts wrote in a note .
Morgan Stanley psychoanalyst said Friday that the current suit could also favour Apple , as many similar allegations have already been rule on by a judge in the Apple vs Epic case , with the opinion say that Appledoes not plunder antimonopoly police . The DOJ filing also only makes a comparatively passing mention of Apple ’s $ 10 billion - plus search deal with Google and does n’t cite the App Store as one of its five master example of monopolistic behaviour .
Bernstein analysts added , “ While the DoJ ’s charges are focused on iPhone , we do not see potential remediation as materially impacting Apple financially or undermine the iPhone franchise : sorry case , Apple pay a fine , and loose restrictions for competition across the Io political program , which we believe will have limited encroachment on iPhone user retention or on Services receipts . ”
Which led Morgan Stanley analysts to conclude that the DOJ ’s lawsuit creates “ more of a newspaper headline risk than a near - terminal figure event risk of exposure ” for Apple .
Join us at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
Exhibit at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
They added :
Said other than , yes , this cause creates a stock overhang , but the market has a light term memory and in our view , basic principle are more probable to ride Apple ’s strain terms over the next 12 months ( and several years ) , rather than this lawsuit . We can mention a number of diachronic instances where fellowship in the midst of litigation threatening their kernel product / differentiating economic value proposal have outperformed despite the legal overhang : 1 ) Apple / Epic , where the stock outperformed by 15 peak in the 18 month following Epic ’s first effectual filing threatening App Store take rates in August 2020 , and 2 ) USA vs. Google , where the stock has nearly doubled since the DOJ first announced its investigating into Alphabet ’s hunting practices . Our point being , rule / litigation is a greater longterm backside risk of infection for Apple than it has been historically , but the underlying driver of the stock for the foreseeable future will almost certainly be fundamentals - based , especially devote this case might not be resolved until at least 2028 ( or even 2030 ) based on preceding cases .
